By Subhas lamichhane
In face of repeated betrayals by the
self-proclaimed communist parties of Nepal, the question of where will they
stand in the upcoming elections is worth pondering.
|
Author |
Ours is the part of world where people are easily swayed by
communism. No wonder, no other ideology appeals to the youths left out in the
cold as do the red letters of communism. The abject poverty and neglect with
which our ‘working class’ is afflicted works as a perfect recipe for the
communist parties (CPs) to drag them to their folds. So, it’s not altogether
surprising that we have witnessed the phenomenal rise of hotheaded
revolutionary parties in our recent political history. It’s partly because of
the fact that projecting oneself as the messiah of the oppressed lot requires
no more than distributing false hopes of ‘dictatorship of the proletariat’ and
‘a utopian society free of all injustices’. The ‘red books’ and the ‘great
quotes’ are so designed as to make those hungry and half-clad hapless men
completely indoctrinated so that from then onwards, communism becomes their
only religion and the party their only savior. It thus comes as no secret that
what makes this country’s people underprivileged is also what makes them so vulnerable
to communist appeals: the feudal landscape.
However, as I write, I sense in the new generation an allergy
toward the ‘communist’ word itself. While the young turks are impatient for a
complete overhaul of the system, there is a deep resentment and distrust towards
the current breed of political parties, even more so towards the communists.
It’s easy to see why. When the supposed architect of one’s destiny hoodwinks at
a scale never imagined before, the resulting frustration gets expressed in the
form of hatred. This brings us to the fact that; while little has changed in
the dismal socio-economic status of the have-nots, the much-needed fuel for the
survival of our type of communist parties (CPs); the charm and charisma they
possessed has become a ‘once upon a time’ story.
Just until a year back, the Nepali CPs were enjoying a
widespread ‘popular mandate’ as evident in the power equation within the
now-dissolved CA. Not that the CPs will be altogether swept away in the next CA
polls (if ever they occur, of course), but the precious faith people had
reposed in them has altogether faded away. Given that the non-CPs are no
better, the sizable population is currently caught between the devil and the
deep blue sea. Ultimately, the only feasible option remains ‘choosing the bad
from the worst’, which in turn makes it hard to speculate on the chances of how
the ‘comrades’ will fare in the upcoming elections. But, one thing is for sure,
the ‘working class’ is utterly disenchanted with its ‘vanguard’; and whatever ‘Garibkaa
din aaye’ type hope the last CA election had kindled have been doused. Who
knows, the apologetic mass may once again choose to vote these inept communists
to power, but take it, that precious ‘enthusiasm factor’ has long been lost.
Going by the reports, it is proving to be a gargantuan task for ‘Baidya &
Co.’(chairman of so called neo-revolutionary splinter Maoist party of Nepal) to
recruit militias, let alone sustain the armed struggle, which they are
reportedly mulling over. This dwindling communist base in the soil as fertile
as ours may have come as a respite for elites, but the gravity of the matter
deserves serious discussions.
To start with, I base my argument on the premise that - none
of our so-called CPs are concerned with the core ideas of Marxism and hence are
not communists in their conducts. Even
the so-called ‘pure communists’ within breakaway Baidya faction are interested
not in the ideology and the ‘proletariat’, but in a proxy war with their mother
party over power, position and prestige. While it goes without saying that UML
has long been a flock of crows that have lost their way in the fog, the UCPN
(Maoist) having abandoned the ‘glorious Janayuddha’
(people’s war) is in a even more glorious ‘Dhanayuddha’
(fight for wealth) drive. Meanwhile, Comrade Bijukche aka Rohit may well be
resisting the temptations of Singha Durbar till date, but admit I must that I’m
unaware of any substantial contribution his party, being confined to the
smallest district, has made in the lives of the ‘workers and peasants’ at large
. Regarding scores of other splinter CPs, do they really need a mention in the
first place?
It’s interesting to note that the largest party in the erstwhile
CA, UCPN (Maoist), had taken its root in the wake of the fall of the Berlin
Wall, when all other communist movements across the globe were either
collapsing or had been defensive at best. Ironically, once it entered the
political mainstream after fighting a decade-long civil war, it itself got so
deeply immersed in the parliamentary shenanigans that it emerged out of this quicksand
a completely changed party. For the top guns and the ‘Khaaobaadis’ within, this degeneration meant a ‘great leap
forward’, but for the rank and file, nothing could be more heart-wrenching than
to watch this tragic scene: the ‘dear party’ getting transformed by the system,
instead of ‘transforming the system’ itself.
Of course, in a welcome step, UCPN (M) has taken great
strides in the ideological front since its inception some two decades back. It
is no longer a traditional dogmatic CP that believes in state capture through
the barrel of a gun. It has agreed to abide by the basic tenets of democracy,
and has shown that a party can be ‘progressive and people-oriented’ (at least
in theory) by being democratic at the same time. But, the tragedy starts
herein, when this ‘progressive and people-oriented’ approach gets locked in the
narrow confines of its documents. While in theory it remains a pragmatic CP; in
conduct, it is nowhere near socialism, let alone communism. The lifestyle of
leaders is lavish, thinking style borders on feudalism and working style is
near authoritarian. The whims and caprices of a select few govern the party. No
doubt, this is a malady afflicting not only the UCPN (M), but every single
party in Nepal. The gap between what they preach in the election manifesto and
how they behave while in power is too wide. Unless they sincerely try to bridge
this, it’s impossible for them to regain the lost faith.
Take for example, the BRB government’s move to evict the
landless people from their makeshift homes. Or take the series of unnatural
price hikes in essential daily commodities that he presided. Or take his open
display of nepotism during various government institutions. That’s how he chose
to antagonize his constituencies practically in sharp contrast to his pious
written or spoken words. And that’s how his party degenerated in the hands of
elites who were bent on stopping the wave of change. It still baffles me to see
how soon a ‘people’s party’ that had shed blood to end inequality and
injustices of all sorts forgot its own history and started hobnobbing with its
‘class enemies’.
Personally, I feel that socialism is the only way forward
for Nepal. But the problem is: even the communists are not ready for it. They
are overtly socialists, but in theory alone. Until and unless these CPs are
ready to translate their socialist ritualistic rhetoric into actions, their exposure
as ‘false communists/socialists’ will continue to erode their fertile base. And
a day will come when the disgruntled youths will stop being their cannon
fodders forecasting something ominous for the future of communism. If however,
our CPs can learn from their history and that of elsewhere, China and Russia in
particular, and then move ahead in the path of rapid socio-economic growth
accordingly, their future is not so bleak after all.
Raised in the plains of Dang in the mid-western Nepal,Subhas Lamicchhane completed his schooling from the far-western Mahendranagar. Currently, he is doing his MBBS final year in UCMS, Bhairahawa. He loves reading works of fiction and non-fiction alike, in addition to travelling. He is also an avid blogger and regularly posts in his personal blog HIDE N SEEK.)
No comments:
Post a Comment